![]() |
| HOME |
REVISION / SUPPORTAS Biology Calendar
for the year
|
Use the following headings & sub-headings in this order: Planning Hypothesis ~ what is the idea you want
to test Implementing Summary of results ~ A table of the
averages, percentages, S.D.s etc Analysis Trends & patterns in the results
~ what are they? Evaluation Reliability of the data ~ Use you SD
calculations/error bars to help you discuss how certain you are of
the meaning of your results. Appendix Raw Results ~ all the results you collected
whilst doing the experiment. No averages, percentages etc. Further notes to help you The whole assessment should be about 3500 words plus graphs, diagrams, tables, calculations etc Planning Everything in your experiment must be well controlled. There is no such thing as "room temperature". Students are expected to find out if reactions are exothermic and control the temperature of the reaction. Method details are essential. E.g. "use a light meter to measure the amount of light passing through the coloured filter" is not good enough. How should the light meter be used? What distance from the filter? What is behind the filter? Etc etc. Risk Analysis should quote from Cleaps cards etc. It must be thorough and must say what is being done to make it safe. It should be clear that the candidate knows what they are going to do with the results and that is why they have planned to do the experiment in the way they have. E.g. "I am going to repeat each test 20 times so that I have a sufficient sample size to carry out a standard deviation calculation" "I am going to do 5 different temperatures and then when I find the optimum temperature I am going to carry out two further experiments 20C either side of that temperature to allow me to draw a more accurate line graph." Implementing All units MUST be SI. No minutes or hours, time must be in seconds. No % strengths when it is possible to work out molarities Units must be at the tops of columns only ~ not in the boxes Links between data must be clearly defined. No theoretical discussion here, every comment must refer to or be related to the results. Explain the results using factual knowledge, if these facts have already been explained in detail in the plan then refer to them accurately but you don't need to repeat them all again Draw only the graph(s) that clearly relate to proving/disproving the hypothesis. Hand drawn not computer generated. No lines of best fit ~ join the points with a straight line between each. Do not project beyond actual results gained. Anomalous results should have been eliminated during the practical by repeating. Deviations from a perfect curve are not anomalous nor are results which don't happen to fit your prediction, but you must discuss why it is that they do not fit. Include error bars. These can be SD calculations with bigger samples, or just range bars in smaller numbers of repeats. You must refer to the variability of you results. In discussion refer to raw data as well as summarised data.
"No matter how carefully I do the experiment what would stop me getting identical results if I repeated it?" What further work could you do
to get more information directly related to the hypothesis?
|
![]() |
| COPYRIGHT © 2008, BEAUMONT SCHOOL, ST ALBANS, HERTFORDSHIRE |